Sunday, March 09, 2014
Must we leave all of our children the same amount?
A married couple who read the column is nearing the age at which they say they want to get their financial affairs in order, including deciding how they will leave their assets to their three children after the couple dies.
When they drew up their will several years ago, they planned to split their assets equally among their three children.
"But each child's circumstances have changed considerably," the husband writes.
The couple is financially helping out one child and his family because of that child's poor health.
Another child, however, is in good financial shape with a great job and good pension.
"Our third child and family are doing quite well in good part because of our involvement in assisting them in some business dealings."
The parents are torn between leaving their will as is, or apportioning their children's inheritance according to their needs.
"We don't want to be unfair to any of them," writes the husband, "but the one with the least income and poor health can certainly use more money than the others."
The couple estimates that the total inheritance will be a little more than $1 million.
"My wife and I are both getting to an age where we must make a decision regarding this matter soon," writes the husband. "I'm sure we are not alone in trying to solve this sort of thing. But we don't really know who we can discuss it with."
There are financial professionals who advise on wills and estates. But the couple already knows who to go to for a will. The problem is trying to sort out the "fairness" of whatever choice they make.
They are certainly not alone. Many couples wrestle with how to allocate their assets after they die. While it's often possible to leave equal shares of whatever assets there are to any surviving children, there are sometimes mitigating circumstances that cause parents to wonder about the best thing to do.
Some parents who've loaned one child and not others large sums of cash and have never been repaid, for example, decide to deduct that amount from that child's share of an inheritance. If one child provided primary care for an ailing parent, there are occasions when parents decide to leave that child a bit more.
Leaving equal shares might be the simplest thing to do, but since the money belongs to the parents, they have every right to allocate it however they wish. They also have every right to spend as much of the money as they wish (or all of it) before they die.
If they do decide to leave more money to the child with significant health issues, the right thing to do is discuss their plans with all three children. There's no requirement that they do this, but if they truly care for their children and want to avoid creating ill will among them after the parents' deaths, discussing how the assets will be divided before the time comes is the best way to handle the situation.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Right Thing: Conscience, Profit and Personal Responsibility in Today's Business and The Good, the Bad, and Your Business: Choosing Right When Ethical Dilemmas Pull You Apart, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
What ethical issues concern people the most? This September marks the 19th year I've been writing "The Right Thing" c...
When P.D. was offered a job recently by the person who would be her supervisor, something she thought unusual occurred. Her prospective sup...
It had been a long day at work for C.L., a reader from Boston. She'd started work early and was home right before 6 p.m. As she wal...
Several years ago, M.C.'s home insurance broker advised her that she should consider having any valuables she had at home appraised...