"First come, first served," is a policy that
most of us have experienced. The general principle is that whoever gets to a
particular thing enjoys first dibs on using or buying that thing. Occasionally,
the approach backfires with tragic results, as witnessed by overzealous crowds
at department stores eager to be first in the door to buy a newly on sale
product, or by fans who storm a venue which features stadium seating to be
first in the gate.
But often, a first come, first served approach works.
Apple product fans are known to camp out overnight waiting for a store to open
so they can be first in line to get the latest release of some gadget or other.
And some airlines use a first come, first served approach to issuing boarding
passes for their flights.
G.N., a reader from Ohio, regularly flies on such an
airline that boards passengers in the order in which they got their boarding
passes. Since seats are not assigned, the first people on board get their pick
of seats.
"I try to get my boarding pass soon after it becomes
available so I get a good seat," writes G.N. But he observes that the good
seats are "a zero-sum game," meaning that his gain in getting a good
seat first is some other passenger's loss. That only makes sense since there are
a finite number of seats on any passenger plane.
But while he takes pride in getting his boarding pass as
soon as it becomes available, it gnaws at G.N. a bit that his efficiency might
not always be fair.
"If I have plenty of time to make my connection at
the next airport and others have a tight connection, shouldn't I let them get
earlier boarding so they could sit near the front and get off first?"
G.N. raises a good point. If someone else on the plane
risks losing his or her connecting flight by being seated far back on the
airplane, wouldn't the right thing be to make sure to move those with
connecting flights up closer to the airplane's exit?
Perhaps, but such consideration would be true for anyone
flying on any flight regardless of whether it uses a first come, first served
boarding method. It would be thoughtful and make sense if the airline figured
out which passengers had the tightest connecting times and made sure they were
seated so they could exit the airplane first.
So yes, G.N., the right thing would be to try to make
flying as simple and effortless as possible for all passengers and to take
special note of those who might need more time to make connections. But the
responsibility for doing so doesn't fall on you or other passengers. It falls
squarely on the airlines which, after all, are selling a service to their
passengers.
Perhaps airlines can make the effort to make flying a bit
less anxiety producing by providing such a service. In the meantime, while it's
the airlines responsibility to try to get their passengers to their
destinations safely and on time, showing courtesy to fellow travelers whenever
possible, whether it's to let them step in front of you to exit the plane if
they've a tight connection or helping them lift a suitcase into the overhead,
is simply a nice thing to do.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's KennedySchool. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues.
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
(c) 2015 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.