Sunday, January 12, 2025

Looking back at another year of doing The Right Thing

A year ago, at the end of 2023, after looking at the analytics for the website where The Right Thing weekly column gets posted after it has run in publications that carry it, it was clear that readers were most drawn to columns that touched on leaving jobs gracefully, maintaining privacy after death, showing gratitude in tough times and learning how to support children without doing their work for them.

In 2024, the top five columns focused on being an engaged citizen, companies that prop up bad behavior in advertisements, learning to lose gracefully, not allowing pretension to get in the way of our message and whether companies are obligated to honor commitments even if they were made in jest.

The fifth-most viewed column, “Fly me to the moon,” ran in late October. I wrote it shortly after a billionaire financed Elon Musk’s Polaris Dawn spaceflight for roughly $200 million. I reminisced about signing up for a “First Moon Flight Club” sponsored by Pan American Airways in the late 1960s. Pan Am is long gone as a company, but I argued that even if this was a marketing gimmick, if the company were still around and actually offering trips to the moon, it would do well to see if those who signed up were interested. Granted, few of us would be able to foot the bill. Nevertheless, it would be nice to be asked.

An August column, “Humor can be a funny thing,” was written in response to a series of television advertisements run by a national mattress company. The ads featured people behaving badly being asked how they slept at night. The response was always that they slept on one of the company’s mattresses. That the ads seemed to suggest that you too could behave badly if only you used our product struck me as an odd marketing strategy.

Using a line from Steely Dan about wanting a name when we lose, an October column, “How we lose can define us,” concluded that how we behave when we lose can go a long way toward sending a message about our character.

In September, I wrote in “Do too many signature credentials smack of pretension?” about how those who use too many initials and affiliations in their email signatures might come off as trying too hard to appear more impressive than they need to. It was best, I argued, not to let such things risk getting in the way of the message you were trying to convey.

Finally, by far the most viewed Right Thing column of the year was early November’s “Don’t get angry. Get to work.” I argued in the column that anger in response to some effort not going the way we wanted too often sapped our energy and distracted us from continuing to focus on other ways to achieve our goals. “If we were truly concerned about a cause, that cause doesn’t disappear because we didn’t get our way,” I wrote. “Rather than stew in anger or regret, the right thing seems to be to double down on any efforts to engage in whatever work is needed to set things straight.”

Thank you for continuing to email your questions, stories and reactions to The Right Thing column. May your years continue to be full of doing the right thing while surrounded by those who choose to do the same.

Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a senior lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues.

Do you have ethical questions that you need to have answered? Send them to jeffreyseglin@gmail.com.

Follow him on Twitter @jseglin.

(c) 2025 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.

Sunday, January 05, 2025

If you stain a pair of jeans before you check out, must you buy them?

How honest should you be when returning product to store shelves?

A reader we’re calling Davis is particular about the type of denim jeans he wears, both brand and style. He keeps a lookout when they become available at the membership warehouse club to which he belongs since the price is much better than elsewhere.

A challenge Davis has is that the size jeans he wears, waist and inside leg length, is rarely as available as other sizes. He figures that he either has unusual measurements or one of the most common measurements. Whatever the reason, Davis tries to grab a pair of his favorite jeans whenever he finds them at a good price. Typically, by the time this happens the jeans he does own either have holes in the knees or splattered paint or grease embedded in the denim.

But on a recent trip to his warehouse club, large stacks of Davis’ favorite jeans were piled up on counters in the center of the store. Davis parked his shopping cart at the end of the counter, ransacked his way through the hundreds of pairs of jeans to see if they had his size. He grabbed the two pair of jeans in his size that were in the denim piles.

Pleased with his find, Davis went about his shopping. He picked up a rotisserie chicken, a bag of coffee beans, some navel oranges, and a container of strawberries, among other things. When he got to the line queued up for the cash registers, Davis noticed that the strawberries had been sitting on top of the jeans and had left what looked to be a stain on them.

Now, Davis was faced with a decision. Should he buy the jeans and hope to get the stain out? Should he pull out of line and go back to toss the jeans onto the pile where he found them? Or should he go to the customer service counter at the front of the store and hand the jeans over to them explaining what happened?

Two of these options could have been a right thing to do. Davis could have purchased the jeans and hoped for the best in removing the stain. Or he could have handed the jeans over to the customer service desk or to the cashier at the cash register and explained what happened. Returning them with a stain to the pile of goods may have been the quickest remedy, but that chanced that an unsuspecting customer might purchase them without noticing the strawberry blemish.

If Davis didn’t want to deal with getting the stain out of the jeans, then the right thing would have been to turn them over to someone at the store who could make the decision about what to do with them. Davis shouldn’t feel guilty if he chose not to buy the jeans even though he was the one who wasn’t careful about where the strawberries were placed in his cart. He should be no more responsible for this error of judgment than he would be had he knocked over a jar of olives. Next time the jeans become available, however, Davis would be wise to be more careful about his cart produce placement.

Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a senior lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues.

Do you have ethical questions that you need to have answered? Send them to jeffreyseglin@gmail.com.

Follow him on Twitter @jseglin.

(c) 2025 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.