When I was a kid growing up in Northern New Jersey, my
parents would regularly shop at a supermarket that was next door to a discount
department store. The department store had an arcade that consisted of a dozen
games. My favorite was a baseball game where you used one button to control the
speed of a pitched ball bearing and another button to swing a bat at the ball.
The thrill of getting enough base hits to score some runs was enough to keep my
11-year-old self-occupied until my parents finished grocery shopping and came
to retrieve me.
On one occasion, I saw that there was an unplayed game
left on the baseball machine so I finished playing it. When that game was
complete, another game started up. I played that one too. And then another.
Finally, after about 10 minutes, the guy who regularly repaired the arcade
machines walked over to me and asked, "Did you pay for that game?"
I hesitated, but could only think to respond, "I
only have a few hits left."
That was when he pointed to the coin slots that had black
electrical tape over them. No one could have inserted any coins to play. He
knew I hadn't paid to play. I knew it too.
A question that I've received from readers in one form or
another over the past several months is whether it's ethical for politicians to
deny responsibility for something they've said or done. I suspect they know
it's not.
I was 11 when it was confirmed for me that denying
something that clearly I'd done was not the right thing to do.
For politicians, who are adults with rich life
experiences, they should know better than to deny the obvious. It's not just
that their earlier comments can be trotted out on tape to make them look
foolish as they contradict themselves. More than one politician has found
himself or herself mocked by Jon Stewart, Trevor Noah, John Oliver, Samantha
Bee, Stephen Colbert, or another late-night comedian who runs rapid fire video
clips catching the politician contradicting or denying something he or she had
previously said.
Getting caught may be a deterrent, but it's not the
reason not to lie. If politicians expect voters to trust them, they should take
responsibility for their words.
It's reasonable for politicians to withhold information
in the interest of national security. It's a whole different thing when a
politician says that maybe a demonstrator at one of his events "should
have been roughed up" or says of another that "I'd like to punch him
in the face" and then tells an anchor of a network morning news show,
"I don't condone violence."
Just as I was confronted by the arcade game worker years
ago, panicked, and didn't want to get caught doing something wrong, it's easy
to imagine how politicians caught behaving inconsistently or badly might panic
and reach for what they think is strength in a lie.
I was wrong, but I was 11 years old. Adult politicians
should know better. The right thing would be for them to think about what
they're saying before they say it. But when they do say it, they should own
their words.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues.
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
(c) 2015 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
No comments:
Post a Comment