On his drive to help his grandparents do yardwork,
18-year-old Walt noticed that it had begun raining. He didn't know if his
grandparents would have any raingear that fit him, so he stopped at a discount
store to pick up an inexpensive raincoat. When he got to the shelf with the
rain gear, he noticed that it had been picked over pretty thoroughly with much
of the gear strewn about rather than in the original packaging.
But Walt persisted and found a bag that contained
raincoat and rain pants, but seemed to be missing the snap-on hood that was
shown on the package diagram. Walt fished through the pile of raingear, found a
hood, and brought it and the package that he thought contained the coat and
pants up to the cashier.
After explaining that he had pulled a hood from the pile
in the area because it seemed to be missing from the package, the cashier rang
him up, and collected his $4 for the inexpensive gear.
When Walt arrived at his grandparents' home, they were
already in the yard working in the rain. They took a break when he arrived and
went inside. When Walt pulled out the raingear to show his grandparents that he
had come prepared, the hood that he thought was missing from the package fell
to the floor when he unfolded the raincoat.
"Did it come with two hoods?" his grandfather
asked him.
Walt explained what had happened and that he had taken an
extra hood mistakenly thinking the original was missing. "The stuff was a
mess in the store," Walt explained. "But it only cost me four
bucks."
Walt put on his gear and then joined his grandparents in
their yard where they worked for the next three hours edging garden beds and
spreading mulch.
After a hearty, home-cooked meal, Walt took a warm
shower, changed his clothes, and then got into his car to return home.
"I'm pretty sure what the right thing to do
is," writes Walt, who decided to stop at the store on his way home and
return the extra hood. "But given how much of a mess the stuff was in the
store and the fact that the cashier didn't check out the goods when I was
paying, was I really obligated to return the hood? The whole thing only cost
four bucks."
Walt wonders if it would have been all the same if he
simply had kept the extra hood in case he needed a backup in the future.
The price of the rain gear isn't any issue here. Whether
it cost $4 or $45 dollars shouldn't make a difference and is mere just
quibbling over price.
While Walt is right and the cashier should have checked
the goods before checking out his customer, Walt still got something he didn't
pay for. It might have been a nuisance to return to the store to return the
extra hood, but it was the right thing to do. I suspect Walt's grandparents
knew what he would do without having to advise him to do so.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues.
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
(c) 2017 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
1 comment:
I hope this young man does the right thing and returns the rain hood to the store. Doing the right thing is never the wrong thing to do.
Post a Comment