Is it ever OK to get what you don't pay for?
L.H., a reader from Massachusetts, subscribes to basic
cable television service from one of his local providers. "I'm not a big
TV watcher," he writes, "but I like to be able to watch news and
sports channels on occasion that are available through my cable
subscription." He notes that he doesn't pay for any premium channels or
extras in an effort to keep his bill as low as possible.
A neighbor recently told L.H. that he had been able to
watch some premium cable channels without having to pay for them. "A
glitch in the system, apparently," writes L.H. Upon learning of this news
from his neighbor, L.H. figured he would give it a try and soon he too was
regularly watching shows and movies on the premium channel without paying for
them. "I know I wasn't being charged," he writes, "because the
little button you have to press to buy the show or subscribe to the channel
never showed up on my screen."
For several weeks, L.H. continued to watch the premium
channel. (It turns out he might be more of a TV watcher than he lets on.) But
he indicates that he knows he's getting something for nothing and wonders if
it's wrong to take advantage of what appears to be a glitch that allows
non-premium subscribers to tune in for free.
"Eventually, I suspect the glitch will be
fixed," he writes, "but in the meantime is it wrong for me to tune in
when I know I haven't paid for the service?"
Given that premium cable channels sometimes offer free
trials by making the shows they regularly charge for free to all comers, L.H.
might not be getting something for nothing as he suspects he is. But suppose
it's not a free trial and simply an error that lets viewers get free access? Is
it wrong to take advantage?
It's a question that could apply to several situations.
Suppose, for example, everyone at work knows there's a vending machine that
dispenses two soft drinks every time someone pays for just one?
The responsibility is ultimately on the cable television
provider to make sure that its system works so that subscribers get what they
paid for and are charged for extras when appropriate. If L.H. wants to do the
right thing, it would be to check with his cable service provider to see if the
premium channel is running a special offer that allows him to check in. He
might also check his bill to make sure he hadn't inadvertently signed up for
something he didn't want.
The same goes for the soft drink machine. A quick call to
the service phone number on the machine to alert the vendor that its machine is
dispensing multiple drinks for the price of one would be the right thing to do.
Once L.H. alerts the company, it's up to it to fix the
system if it's broken. Cable service might strike L.H. and others as already
too high for even the most basic of services. But the option exists to cancel
any service that seems too expensive. Knowing the you're wrongly receiving
services for free might feel like a windfall, but it's still taking advantage
of a mistake to get something that isn't rightfully yours.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a senior lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues.
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
(c) 2017 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
1 comment:
Click here
Check from here
Post a Comment