Just how responsible are you for letting others know
about your experiences with businesses they recommended or may use themselves?
N.L., a reader from the New England area, recently
decided to have the wooden floors in her house refinished. Because she wanted
to have some sense that the floor refinisher might do a good job, she asked the
owner of the company that painted her house several years earlier for a
reference.
After receiving the reference from the painter, N.L. met
with the floor refinisher. He measured the rooms and gave her a price for the
job. She alerted him to the fact that the floors in one of the rooms had been
particularly troublesome since they had wooden pegs covering screws. Over the
years, many of the pegs had come loose and she had had to replace them.
"No problem," the refinisher said.
The refinisher told N.L. that he had had a cancellation
and could fit the job in the following week. He calculated that it would take
no more than a week to get the floors done. N.L. gave the refinisher a check
for half the quoted price.
A week passed and the job was not completed. The floor
refinisher told N.L. that his regular crew was sick and he had to make do with
one assistant. After another week, the refinisher called N.L. to tell her he
was done. She was at work when he finished, so she thanked him and said she'd
check out the floors when she got home. When she got home and checked, she saw
that six pegs were missing from the troublesome floor.
She called the refinisher to tell him about the missing
pegs.
"If I'd known these pegs were going to be such a
problem, I never would have taken the job," he responded. But he said he'd
come back and install the pegs and do the sanding and finishing that needed
doing the following week.
After three weeks, the floors were finally done and N.L.
reports that they are beautiful. But she wants to know if she should let the
painter who recommended the floor refinisher and the neighbor who asked for the
refinisher's contact information so he could have his own floors redone about
the one week turning into three and the refinisher's complaint about how
difficult the job turned out to be.
The right thing for N.L. to do is to let her neighbor
come over and examine the floors for himself. If he likes the quality of work,
he can decide whether to use the refinisher. N.L. would be right to let her
neighbor know about the challenges of working with the refinisher, but still
the choice should be his.
It would also be good to let the painter know both that
she liked the end product, but that she found the refinisher more challenging
to work with than anticipated. It's up to the painter to decide if he wants to
continue to recommend the refinisher for other jobs.
N.L. doesn't have to say anything to her neighbor or to
the painter. But if she wants to do right by each of them, the right thing is
to give each enough information to decide for himself how to proceed.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Right Thing: Conscience, Profit and Personal Responsibility in Today's Business and The Good, the Bad, and Your Business: Choosing Right When Ethical Dilemmas Pull You Apart, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
(c) 2014 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
2 comments:
I'd be honest and say the good as well as bad. If she is happy with the work but disappointed in the time, she should say that as is. To both.
Staying away from recommending might be good and telling the person who suggested him is very good. Give your experiences and let the others decide.
Alan Owseichik
Greenfield, Ma.
This commenter has entirely too much time on her hands. True, her problem was important and the painter didn't do things perfectly, but he did make it right. Not among the world's more important problems, I'd say.
Charlie Seng
Post a Comment