After an experienced dental hygienist, D.H., moved to a
new state, she accepted a position to work at a medium-sized dental practice.
After being on the job for a few months, D.H. noticed several red flags that
suggested the dental practice's business manager was embezzling money.
D.H. had seen similar behavior in the office where she
used to work.
The business manager was considered "honest and
trustworthy," treated almost like a family member by the dentist. The
relationship between her and the dentist was close - like mother and son.
D.H. noticed that the business manager was "overly
protective" of her workstation, keeping others out and locking the
business office door whenever she was away. She also regularly complained or
bad-mouthed co-workers, drawing attention away from her own behavior, figures
D.H.
D.H.'s experience at her prior job was that the embezzler
got caught after being gone for a while on vacation and someone else went
through the office mail. But the office manager at D.H.'s new job arranged for
a niece to fill in for her while she vacationed overseas.
Bringing in her own replacement struck D.H. as
suspicious. And there were those other tell-tale signs of embezzlement --
carefully guarding the office computer from other employees, diverting
attention from herself by criticizing other employees and office conditions,
living in a way that "seemed well beyond her means."
In spite of the tell-tale signs, D.H. believes it often
seems safer to just look the other way and keep quiet. "An old rule says
keep your eyes on your own plate."
But D.H. also figures that while the suspected embezzler
may think she's just stealing from the dentist, she's also taking money that
won't be available for raises or bonuses to the staff. Innocent workers also
get robbed in the process.
"What are the options?" asks D.H. "What's
the right thing to do?"
While some readers might think D.H. should mind her own
business if she doesn't have definitive proof that the business manager is
doing something wrong, I don't agree.
D.H. could approach the business manager and let her know
that at her previous place of work they had instituted practices to ward off
the chances of foul play. The risk, of course, is that if the business manager
is stealing that she will suspect that D.H. is on to her and make her the new
target of her complaints.
If D.H. truly suspects that the business manager is up to
no good and that no good could come from directly confronting the business
manager, she should let the dentist know. The risk, of course, is that the
dentist would become defensive, arguing that the business manager would never
do something like that to him, after all, he and the business manager are like
family.
But letting the dentist know that his practice may be the
victim of theft is the right thing to do. If the dentist refuses to listen, or
if he refuses to take some action to protect himself against embezzlement, then
D.H. must decide if this is the practice where she really wants to work.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Right Thing: Conscience, Profit and Personal Responsibility in Today's Business and The Good, the Bad, and Your Business: Choosing Right When Ethical Dilemmas Pull You Apart, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
(c) 2014 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
2 comments:
Jeffrey,
Trashing someone's reputation with serious charges like embezzlement on such flimsy "evidence" is definitely not the right thing to do. All this discussion with the dentist will do is to alienate the new employee from her employer and ultimately the rest of the office. If DH had seen anything concrete then it would be right to speak up but based on what was said here, there would appear to be completely innocent explanations for the office manager's actions. The office manager is protective of her workspace?!? Perhaps she has a set method of running the office that she doesn't want the hygienist messing with. DH cites the office manager's bad-mouthing others as evidence of her criminality - would DH bad-mouthing the office manager (in the national press, no less!) be evidence of her own embezzlement?!? If not, then maybe we need to rethink the conclusions that DH has jumped to. There is nothing to see here. Move along.
William Jacobson
Anaheim, CA
I agreed with Jeff until I saw William's response. DH has no evidence at all. Only that she saw something similar (so she thinks) and believes the worst. A new hire to accuse a long tested employee with this evidence would probably be her demise.
And the doctor must have some kind of accounting systems to point out these things. Particularly if they are big ones.
She should leave on her own and be done with it all.
Alan Owseichik
Greenfield, Ma.
Post a Comment