Five years after a reader, L.S. left her previous job,
she is still receiving emails addressed to her old company's email address.
L.S. had always forwarded her old work email to her
private Gmail address. It was simpler to manage all of her email from one
account, she figured. She can no longer log on to her old company's server to
turn off the forwarding, but she figures that her old company would have shut
her email down after she left if it had wanted to.
"I don't receive any inner-office emails or anything
that appears to be confidential," she writes. "But I have noticed
that when someone occasionally emails me at my old company's email address, I
still receive it. I also continue to get junk email addressed to that old
address."
She also receives a weekly report from the old company of
email that has been quarantined as spam, all of which is more junk email that
didn't make it through to her.
When L.S. responds to those who write her at the old
email address she reminds them that she has a new email address. She simply
deletes the junk email that comes through.
L.S. wants to know if she was wrong to forward her work
email to her personal email address and whether she has an ethical obligation
to let her old company know that she's still receiving email sent to her old
address.
If L.S.'s former employer had a policy forbidding the
forwarding of work email to a personal email address, she was wrong to do so.
But if the company condoned the practice and employees regularly forwarded
their email to personal email addresses, she's in the clear.
If L.S. is only receiving email that is addressed
directly to her old email address, it might not present a problem, unless that
email is work related. Because there's a chance that she might be receiving
email intended for her as an employee of her former company, the right thing
would be to inform a representative from her former company to let them know
that she still receives emails sent to her former address. The responsibility
then falls on them to decide when to disable her former email address.
The right thing for the company to have done would have
been either to let L.S. know that she would continue to receive email at her
old address (although it seems odd that most companies would see this as a good
practice), or to let her know that her email would be closed out at a certain
point after she stopped working for the company.
The responsibility for figuring this out should not have
fallen on L.S.'s shoulders. But now that it has, she'd be wise to let the
former company know about the situation and give it the opportunity to set
things right. A side benefit for L.S. is that she might receive far less junk
email in her inbox than she has over the past five years.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues.
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
(c) 2015 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
1 comment:
This is a no-problem issue posed as a problem. Why agonize over the emails? Why spend time writing for help in arriving at a solution to the unwanted emails?
The writer should forward one (or more) of the emails to the IT department or employee at her former company. Actually, forward many emails - the more the merrier.
The company will no doubt remove her email address from their server(s). Problem then solved.
Post a Comment