When clients go to visit health care providers at their
neighborhood health clinic, they must first check in with the receptionist at
the front desk. The receptionist then alerts the person with whom the client
has an appointment. The health care professional comes out to greet the client
in the reception area and then leads him or her back to the office where the
appointment will take place.
Generally, the process goes smoothly. But a few weeks ago,
one of the health care professionals (let's call her Constance) was taken aback
after she led a client back to her office, settled in, and listened as her
client recounted a troubling exchange with the receptionist.
According to the client, the receptionist checked her in,
then asked her how she liked working with Constance. After the client told her
she liked working with her just fine, the receptionist responded that she was
just checking because some clients don't like working with her. Constance was
unnerved by the report, but she managed to stay focused on the client's needs
during the rest of the session.
Once the session was over and the client left, Constance
consulted a colleague to tell her what had happened and to ask her if she knew
who the receptionist might have been. Given that two people regularly check
people in, and different receptionists work throughout the week, Constance was
not sure who the person was. More importantly, she wasn't sure why the
receptionist said what she did to her client.
"No one's ever complained to me about being hard to
work with," writes Constance. "But even if they complained to others,
it seems wrong for the receptionist to have said something like she did about
me."
Constance is not entirely sure what, if anything, to do.
She could let the whole issue go without saying anything, but she writes that
beyond troubling her that her own reputation was called into question, there
might exist the possibility that this particular receptionist is violating the
confidentiality of clients who regularly visit the health clinic.
"But I also don't want to drag the client who told
me what happened into this," Constance writes. "What's the right
thing to do?"
Constance has every right and reason to be concerned about
client confidentiality. And it isn't petty for her to simply be upset over the
fact that the receptionist allegedly painted a negative picture of her to one
of her clients. Such behavior is totally inappropriate.
If Constance is not certain which receptionist made the
comment, the right thing would be to let the person who manages the
receptionists know what happened. She needn't involve her client if she wants
to protect her privacy. The right thing for the manager to do is to let
everyone who is working the desk know that such behavior as reported is
inappropriate. Even more importantly, the health care clinic management would
be wise to revisit how it trains the staff, including the receptionists, who
interact with the clients.
Bad-mouthing professionals in such a setting, even in the
guise of idle curiosity, is wrong. It diminishes the capability of people like
Constance to do her job well and puts clients in uneasy positions. It's best to
root out such behavior.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Right Thing: Conscience, Profit and Personal Responsibility in Today's Business and The Good, the Bad, and Your Business: Choosing Right When Ethical Dilemmas Pull You Apart, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
(c) 2019 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
No comments:
Post a Comment