When he stepped onto the subway car, a reader, we'll call
him Bart, could tell right away that a fellow passenger was having some issues
with mobility. The man sitting in a seat next to one of the doors "shouted
out to ask what station the train was stopped at," writes Bart. Bart saw
the man held two tall walking canes taped together, the kind of canes typically
used by people who had impaired vision.
As the train continued, Bart noticed the same behavior at
each stop. At the fifth stop, Bart arrived at his destination. When the doors
opened, he let about a half-dozen others leave the train and then exited the
doors himself. Only a few steps out of the door he heard the man with two canes
tapping them against the door as he tried to exit.
Bart walked back to the train door, held his hand against
the door so it wouldn't start to close before the man had fully exited, telling
the man what he was doing. The man thanked him.
"If you turn to your left you'll be heading toward
the exit," Bart writes that he told the man. The exit was a good 50 yards
away from where Bart and the man exited the train. When the man still seemed
disoriented, Bart asked him if he wanted to take his arm so Bart could lead him
to the station's exit. Again, the man thanked him and took Bart's arm.
They walked slowly and as they did the man told Bart that
he was homeless, that his family lived in a different state, and that he didn't
want to burden them. But he also told him that he came to this stop on the
subway because a local restaurant often offered him a hot meal. He let Bart
know that he appreciated his help and asked if he could guide him to the door
to the public restroom, which Bart agreed to do.
As he was saying goodbye and had begun walking away, the
man said to Bart, "You told me you could help with some money." Bart
writes that he knew the man was homeless and in need, but they'd never talked
about money. "I told him to have a good day and I walked off."
Bart now wonders if it was wrong to leave a person who
seemed so clearly in need without having given him some money. "It was
more that I was taken aback after helping him off the train and to the
restroom," writes Bart. "I felt like I was being accused of lying to
him and I just wanted to leave. His need for money was pretty likely more than
any discomfort I felt."
Bart did the right thing by helping the man get off the
train. That the man was walking quite close to the train tracks after getting
off the train makes his act even more admirable. He has no reason to feel
guilty about not giving the man money. If he had that would have been fine, but
that he took the time to ensure the man's safety and get him to where he wanted
to go was a kind act in and of itself.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Right Thing: Conscience, Profit and Personal Responsibility in Today's Business and The Good, the Bad, and Your Business: Choosing Right When Ethical Dilemmas Pull You Apart, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
(c) 2019 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
No comments:
Post a Comment