Sunday, September 11, 2016

Harvard Coop Event, Monday, September 19, 2016

If you find yourself in Harvard Square in Cambridge, on Monday, September 19, at 7 p.m., please join me and Alex Green for a Q+A about The Simpler Art of Business Etiquette.

Just show up or sign up for the event on the Harvard Coop's Facebook page here.

Why won't assisted living facility enforce its no-gifts policy to employees?



A reader wonders how "big of a stink" she should make about something going on in the assisted living facility where her mother lives.

The director of the facility told her there is a "very strict policy" against residents giving gifts of any sort to employees. "If offered," she says the director told her, "the employees will refuse the gift." The problem is that the policy is not being enforced.

While her mother has thrived at the facility compared to how she was doing in her own home, her daughter says her mother likes to give "little gifts" to her aides, such as fruit, soda, candy, and trinkets she buys at the local dollar store. Occasionally, the gifts are more expensive and include earrings or bracelets she buys from visiting vendors. "She also buys many, many baby gifts when one of the employees has a new baby, which seems is often," she says.

While her daughter thinks such gift giving is harmless and it makes her mother happy, "not once has an employee refused a gift even though supposedly it is against policy."

What concerns her daughter the most, however, is that her mother recently has started giving away some personal items that she had when she lived in her own home. Her daughter is worried that her mother's decision to give away personal items could be a warning sign that her judgment is fading, and that employees are taking advantage. When she asks her mother about the items, she tells her daughter that "she alone has the right to give whatever she wants to whoever she wants."

In the past when she has confronted the director of the facility about these gifts, he's been dismissive, saying that her mother "probably lost whatever it was that she gave away, since workers seem to deny receiving gifts."

Now, she believes she needs to bring the issue up with the director again. If he does not adequately address the breach of policy, she asks if she should contact an ombudsman for the company that owns the facility.

"My mom loves living there, and would not want to move," she writes. "Maybe my mom is truly competent and should be allowed to make gift giving decisions for herself. Maybe I should do nothing. What, if anything, is the right thing for me to do?"

My reader's mother is correct in stating that, as long as she is competent, she should be allowed to make her own gift-giving decisions. But it's wrong for the employees to be accepting gifts if there is indeed a strict policy against them receiving gifts of any sort from residents. For this rule to be effective, it must be enforced by the director and observed by all employees. If the director dismisses complaints about gifts that were accepted, then he is sending a message to employees that violating the rule has no consequences.

The right thing is for the daughter to meet with the director again. If he brushes off the daughter's concerns, she should let him know that she plans to report the issue to the company's ombudsman.

The rule should be enforced. Even if residents desire to give gifts to employees now, enforcing the policy helps ensure that residents are not taken advantage of later. 

Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues. 

Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net. 

Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin 

(c) 2015 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.


Sunday, September 04, 2016

Should therapist use client to gather information on someone else?



A psychotherapist was referred a client by a former colleague. The client, a friend of the former colleague, was looking for a therapist who could help her sort through some issues. Over the course of several months of meeting the psychotherapist and client built a strong rapport by focusing on the client's issues.

The psychotherapist learned during those months that the former colleague was having some health issues. She tried to contact her former colleague with no success. Growing concerned, she asked other mutual colleagues if they had heard directly from the former colleague. None had.

Now, the psychotherapist wonders how appropriate it might be to ask the client in passing how the former colleague is doing. I suspect the psychotherapist knows the answer to her question, but asks it anyway out of concern for the former colleague.

While most licensed therapists have some sort of professional code of conduct to which they adhere, I'm not sure that the code would specifically address the psychotherapist's question she asks here.

What the psychotherapist should remember, and, again, I suspect she does, is that her relationship with her client is built on one that focuses on the client's needs, not on the psychotherapist's or on her former colleague's. By asking the client how the psychotherapist's former client is doing, she shifts the focus of their relationship away from the client's needs and onto her own. Granted, psychotherapists are only human and have needs too, but in the therapeutic relationship, the right focus seems like it should be on the client's needs.

The right thing would be to refrain from asking the client about the former colleague's condition.

Given that the client had a pre-existing relationship with the former colleague and was her good friend, however, there's a chance that the client herself might bring up the former colleague -- particularly since the client knows the psychotherapist also had a pre-existing relationship with the former colleague. If this happens, then the right thing is for the psychotherapist to let the client talk and to engage her in a discussion about the former colleague in a way that stays focused on the client's needs.

The psychotherapist's concern about her former colleague comes from a place of concern and compassion. Her intentions about wanting to know how she is are good. But she should not let her compassion for her former colleague interfere with the work she is doing with her client.

If the psychotherapist is truly concerned about the former colleague's well-being, she should figure out a way to check in on her without violating the trusting relationship she has built with her client. But at some point, if the former colleague doesn't respond to calls or emails, the psychotherapist might want to take that as a sign that the former colleague is not prepared to discuss whatever it is that is going on. The psychotherapist might want to be prepared to let things lie until the former colleague is ready to respond.

The psychotherapist is better trained than I am to entertain what might be motivating the former colleague not to respond. But she should honor the boundaries she's built with her client and those that the former colleague establishes. 

Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Simple Art of Business Etiquette: How to Rise to the Top by Playing Nice, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is also the administrator of www.jeffreyseglin.com, a blog focused on ethical issues. 

Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net. 

Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin 

(c) 2015 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.