When a reader we're calling Jamie was applying for a new
job, his prospective employer we're calling Eve asked him for a list of
references, including current co-workers. Jamie complied by providing three or
four names.
But Jamie let Eve know that he would prefer that she not
contact his current boss because, among other reasons, Jamie had not told her
he was being considered for a new job and he would like not to raise an alarm.
"OK," was Eve's response. Jamie knew that Eve had worked with his
current boss in the past.
Jamie was offered the job and accepted it. A couple of
weeks into the new job, Eve and Jamie were walking to a meeting with a human
resources representative. As they chatted about the role Jamie would be taking
on and his potential relationship to other employees, Eve mentioned Jamie's old
boss and it was clear she had chatted with him about Jamie.
Jamie was taken aback, he says. He had a good impression
of Eve through the hiring process and the first two weeks of work suggested
that he was both welcomed by his new employer and that he would enjoy working
there.
But this passing reference, which Jamie says he didn't
question at the time it was made, made him wonder whether he should feel
betrayed that Eve didn't honor his request, or if he should worry about whether
his old boss had colored her opinion of Jamie in any way.
Jamie also feels torn about whether he should say
anything to Eve about the matter.
While I can understand Jamie's concern, nothing his
former boss or any other reference said kept Eve from offering him the job.
Because Eve knew the former boss, it seems natural that she might solicit his
opinion about Jamie and his work.
The wrinkle is that Jamie was left with the impression
from Eve's "OK" that she had agreed not to contact the former boss
but had done so anyway. From Jamie's report of the incident, this agreement
doesn't seem so clear. Jamie expressed a preference and Eve acknowledged that
preference.
Had Jamie specifically said, "Please do not contact
my former boss" and Eve said "OK" and did so anyway, he might
have a more legitimate beef.
The right thing, in other words, is to be as clear as
possible when making a request of a prospective employer. Giving them an option
does not mean they will choose the option you would have preferred.
While it might have shown good faith for Eve to let Jamie
know she planned to chat up his former boss, she didn't have to do so. That
Jamie ended up with a new job he so far likes seems a good outcome.
Jeffrey L. Seglin, author of The Right Thing: Conscience, Profit and Personal Responsibility in Today's Business and The Good, the Bad, and Your Business: Choosing Right When Ethical Dilemmas Pull You Apart, is a lecturer in public policy and director of the communications program at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin
Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net.
(c) 2019 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
No comments:
Post a Comment