Sunday, August 09, 2015

How honest should you be with boss about departure plans?



L.E., an editor working at a startup company in Chicago, decided to leave her full-time position and start working as a freelance writer. Her plan was to wait two months before giving several weeks' notice so she'd have time to update her resume, create a website and get things in order so she could hit the ground running once she left.

Then, just as L.E. was about to put her plan in motion, her boss, the chair of the company, assigned her the task of ghostwriting the monthly chair's column for the company magazine, which L.E. helps to edit.

"It's kind of an honor to be asked to write this," writes L.E., because the chair is the voice of the company. In the past, the person who's ghostwritten these columns has developed trust and a strong relationship with the chair.

The meetings about the chair's column were scheduled to start months before L.E. planned to give notice.

"I really like and respect my boss," writes L.E., who says the boss is quite maternal toward her employees, in spite of having a reputation of being tough. "I really don't want to leave her in a lurch."

Given the boss' request, does L.E. owe it to the boss to reveal her departure plans earlier than she'd intended?

Leave aside for a moment the appropriateness of having someone else write columns on which the boss then puts her byline. Such practices are common in organizations where communications departments write words for which others take credit. At the very least, we should expect that those adopting others' words should at least read them before publication. And given that editing is already part of her job, L.E. is hardly in a position to tell the boss to write her own column.

Even though L.E. has been offered the opportunity to ghostwrite her boss' column, L.E. has no obligation to tell her boss that she plans to leave earlier than she'd planned to reveal this news. If L.E. believes that giving notice several months in advance of when she planned to leave would jeopardize her position, she has every reason to stick to her original plan.

However, if L.E. truly doesn't want to put her current boss in the position of having to lose her ghostwriter shortly after they've begun working together, the right thing to do is for L.E. to tell her boss. This would also allow another employee to start working on the column right away.

Depending on how her boss responds, L.E. might risk having to launch her freelance career earlier than planned, but she will have done what she believed was right.

In the end, L.E. decided to tell her boss about her plans and how she originally intended to hold off giving notice but felt the chair's column was too important.

"She is very sad to see me go," writes L.E., "but was grateful that I put the good of her department first. The good that came out of this is that she's going to give me freelance work -- a huge deal for an organization that typically doesn't freelance anything." 


Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin 

Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net. 

(c) 2014 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.


Sunday, August 02, 2015

Is it wrong to give a break to those who might not need it, when others clearly do?



Let's say you own a two-family house and live in one of the apartments with your family. You've always rented the other unit to friends or family at below-market rates for the area. You're almost certain that these renters could afford to pay market rates based on their jobs and where they lived before moving into your house.

Now, let's say you've been reading regular reports about families in the area struggling to find affordable apartments. Then, you begin to cross paths with families in your own line of work who desperately want to live in your neighborhood because it's close to their children's schools, healthcare providers and other services they use.

Is it wrong to charge below-market rates to those who can afford to pay more when you know there are families out there in greater need?

A.L., a reader in Boston, posed this question to me recently. She and her spouse own a two-family house in the city. They rent out a two-bedroom apartment to work acquaintances for about $250 less a month than what the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development lists as the averagefair market rent for such a unit in Boston. Comparable apartments in their neighborhood rent for at least $600 more than the couple is charging.

It's not that A.L. frets about the fact that she and her spouse could get more money for the apartment. Given that the mortgage is paid off, they receive more than enough to cover maintenance costs and pocket a nice profit.

A.L. mentioned that she'd read a new report from Northeastern University, "The Greater Boston Housing Report Card2014-2015," which includes observations such as, "Working middle-class families are increasingly being priced out of the region's rental and homeowner market" and "Low-income households...are increasingly finding themselves with excessive housing cost burdens and the potential for homelessness."

Based on the report, A.L. wonders if she and her spouse should offer their apartment at an affordable rate to a family whose needs are greater than those of the friends and family to whom they've been renting.

A.L. and her spouse are fortunate that they're able to show generosity to family and friends by making the apartment available at below-market rates. It's also admirable that A.L. struggles with questions of fairness and displacement in the local housing market.

But just as A.L. has no ethical obligation to rent to friends and family at below-market rates, she also has no obligation to rent to another family whose needs might be greater. Either choice is admirable.

The right thing is for A.L. and her spouse to do is to continue to be conscientious landlords and come to an agreement about how much they want to charge in rent and whether or not to keep the rental in the family. 


Follow him on Twitter: @jseglin 

Do you have ethical questions that you need answered? Send them to rightthing@comcast.net. 

(c) 2014 JEFFREY L. SEGLIN. Distributed by TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.